One of the things I love most about teaching is that every day
is different and that there are often big challenges to work through or
problems to solve.
Insert grade 11 university level chemistry here.
I am currently teaching a group of 14 students, 13 boys and
1 girl. Out of the 13 boys in the room, 7 most definitely struggle to pay
attention for more than 3 minutes at a time. No problem - my style of hands on
learning suits this group quite well. The more exciting of the challenges with
this group is my Asperger’s student Demetri.
I have taught a few with Asperger’s before, but seeing as no
2 Aspies are the same, Demetri presents some unique learning opportunities for
me.
You see, Demetri is not only Asperger’s, but a perfectionist
as well. He struggles to put pen to paper because it won’t be perfect. To ease this struggle and help access Demetri's learning I often dedicate my prep period to chatting with Demetri and testing him orally. We've built a pretty good rapport over the semester, but he'd still rather tell me about things unrelated to chemistry. Go figure! In theory the oral testing should work well, but Demetri lacks
confidence in his academic abilities and therefore whispers his responses.
Most
recently we’ve moved into learning and solving chemistry problems with math. I was hopeful that Demetri would take to this like white on rice as it is concrete, logical and defined. Much to my chagrin math isn't his thing. In fact, when I asked him if he likes math, Demetri replied very matter of fact, "Well Miss, it is a means to an end."
Daily I question the best way to help Demetri learn (chemistry) and build life long skills. From all of this I've really had to modify my rigid expectations of evaluation for students. Demetri knows a lot and accessing it requires some creative solutions. Please - if you have any suggestions, fire me an email. I'd love to try it.
Needless to say, we were definitely the COOLEST twins at Maple Leaf.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment.